You are currently browsing the category archive for the 'politics' category.
i loves me my politics … just cause i cant vote so i have no real tie to anything… and like taking both sides of the argument just for debate sake…
this midterm election is going to be interesting… in virginia and new jersey for governor…. and congress in the 23rd in new york (what a freak show that scozzafava is.. the republican candidate that is more liberal than the democrat…) and i love that they have a seperate ‘conservative’ party .. instead of republican
the new jersey race is gonna be fun …
i love that obama had so much time to stump and campaign some more for corzine in NJ cause it will look really really bad if these 3 races go non-demopcrat
i got an invite to write/contribute for the political blog .. watchblog
so ‘watch’ for my first post here in a few days.. i am just so swamped at work this week, i have not had a chance to write anything, and will post something here soon
check it out… i like the format and the wide range of perspectives that are presented… so you can see how a single issue is viewed by the 3 major political ideologies here in the US
looks like the ‘anonymous’ hackers and wikileaks got to sarah palins personal yahoo email acct ( gov.sarah@yahoo.com ) .. although the page looks to be unavailable at this time .. i did grab the contents earlier today during a meeting that was taking too long and not really engaging…
and they releases personal emails, photos, and contact information … whilst looking for information about ‘troopergate’ and other perceived issues of doing state business via yahoo email to keep it from getting archived or available for litigation
i wonder if these guys have tried hacking barack obamas personal emails… or john mccains … wait he does not know how to use a computer… or joe biden… or hillary … and if ANY of them have discussed issues … even of work related topics over email …
so much for playing by the rules… or even the right to privacy that some of these folks seem to complain about so much… and that this action is a federal crime… pot. kettle. black… if they are trying to be all about disclosure… i guess if the ends justify the means huh?
Loading image
Click anywhere to cancel
Image unavailable
Loading image
Click anywhere to cancel
Image unavailable
i was so glad that tina fey made an appearance on saturday night live … and as expected… played sarah palin.. and she was awesome
so.. i am not a mccain fan… one of the things that i hated recently by mccain was the gang of 14.
this was part of the confirmation debacle of supreme court justice sam alito. when the then republican majority leader frist said that he would invoke the nuclear option to kill the filibuster options available by the minority specific to judicial nomination… john mccain lead a group of seven replublicans and seven democrats that at that last minute… the 11th hour… t – minus 10 seconds…
the replublicans said they would not support the nuclear option… and the democrats said they would not block 3 judicial nominations made by president bush… and then pinky promised not to filibuster any more nominations… except under extreme conditions/crcumstances … really???
the republicans could have killed the stupid and petty filibuster being used by the democrats for judicial nominations for good… and those rules would have applied to the replublicans once and if they were ever in the minority
that is one of the reasons that conservatives dislike john mccain… because in his rogueness and maverick status and liberal media darling … he weakened the party and lead to a backlash of conservatives not voting for those that took part in the gang of 14 and eventually leading to the loss of the house and the senate…
we appreciate bucking convention and bi-partizenship… but mccain always gives and never gets anything of worth in return…
so with the selection of alaskan governor sarah palin, are we gonna be able to get old mccain to drill there if he takes office in november?
I sure hope so …. cause I hate caribou and want them all to die… die… die!!! wait. they will not die cause they dont live in the part of anwr (alaskan national wilderness refuge) they want to drill in… some of them just walk through the area every 6 months or some crap like that…
although nobody knows who she is… Her name has been floating around since the beginning… i think she was one that put the kibosh on the bridge to nowhere and corruption in her state…
i think they are gonna attack her lack of experience.. but actually she has run more stuff than barack and ran the state of alaska and has 80-90% approval ratings as the governor … they prob will attack her as being in with the big oil crowd.. but you know what… why is that bad? the alaskan pipeline.. the existing one that has been there for 30+ years and minimal issues … and there has not been the impact to the animals or environment that they claim.. and our technology is so much better now…
maybe i am a bit biased cause i worked for an oil company for a year.. am i in the pocket of big oil cause of that? maybe.. maybe not… just practical.
i want the magic hydrogen car that flies and emits rainbows and orgasms … uh not on you.. but make you have them… but we were told that flying car technology was going to be in the 90s and we still have huge land locked cars…. so not sure how much stock to put into the alternative energies plans.
i will take the democrats seriously on alternative energies when they fly on commercial flights to their home states and take buses and rail to work and not in sup’d up tahoes and suburbans and fly to engagement after engagement talking about global warming .. wait that is not the word… global climate change… whilst using more energy than all of ususe in a year in probably a week in all of their mansions and private flights.
i will take republicans seriously on oil use when they actually stop spending money on stuff we didnt ask for and actually spend money for the troops and not putting us in a deficit and return to true conservative principles that led us to being a super power in the world and the US that we all want to return to…
hey dnc … thanks for … uh … traffic jams and inconveniencing workers in the downtown area … and all those protests… mmmm … i love hearing f bombs dropped around little kids
you know what… dont let the door hit ya on the ass on your way out of town.
so denver… how much of a boost in revenue did you see because of them being here? oh wait, you had to pay for extra security, extra electricity to power up the stadium instead of the pepsi center… print out 70,000+ signs instead of 20,000 if it would have just been at the pepsi center… had to shut down an interstate highway cause it was at invesco field….
if the rnc ever comes to denver… i would tell them the same thing.
how about webcasts so you are not spending and using up fuel to drive or fly to denver from wherever you came from and being green. did all of you buy your carbon offset credits from al gore yet? how about just watching it on tv or the internets. all of us are gonna lie about being there in person like we all do about concerts like U2 at redrocks
ooo… i bet the people of st paul are feeling the same way about the rnc as i did about the dnc being here…
oh my gawd,,,,
i am not a catholic… but i love that denver has the honor of having archbishop charles j. chaput serving at the archdioceses of denver.
yesterday, nancy pelosi was on meet the press with tom brokaw and made statements about abortionwhen asked about barack obamas answer at the saddleback forum… i knew she was a little batty… but these answers were just goofy… and completely against her catholic faith.
i love that he smacked her down with the bonhoeffer spanky stick
spank you very much mr chaput… we have known that nancy pelosi has been a little kooky .. like her saying that we need to move away from our dependance on fossil fuels and move to natural gas (which IS a fossil fuel.. and her family has investments in natural gas… hmmm maybe a bit of conflict of interest?)
click here (pdf) to download the official letter by archbishop chaput
ON THE SEPARATION OF SENSE AND STATE:
A CLARIFICATION FOR THE PEOPLE OF THE CHURCH
IN NORTHERN COLORADO
To Catholics of the Archdiocese of Denver:
Catholic public leaders inconvenienced by the abortion debate tend to take a hard line in talking about the “separation of Church and state.” But their idea of separation often seems to work one way. In fact, some officials also seem comfortable in the role of theologian. And that warrants some interest,not as a “political” issue, but as a matter of accuracy and justice.Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi is a gifted public servant of strong convictions and many professional skills. Regrettably, knowledge of Catholic history and teaching does not seem to be one of them.
Interviewed on Meet the Press August 24, Speaker Pelosi was asked when human life begins. She said the following:
“I would say that as an ardent, practicing Catholic, this is an issue that I have studied for a long time. And what I know is over the centuries, the doctors of the church have not been able to make that definition . . . St. Augustine said at three months. We don’t know. The point is, is that it shouldn’t have an impact on the woman’s right to choose.”
Since Speaker Pelosi has, in her words, studied the issue “for a long time,” she must know very well one of the premier works on the subject, Jesuit John Connery’s Abortion: The Development of the Roman Catholic Perspective (Loyola, 1977). Here’s how Connery concludes his study:
“The Christian tradition from the earliest days reveals a firm antiabortion attitude . . . The condemnation of abortion did not depend on and was not limited in any way by theories regarding the time of fetal animation. Even during the many centuries when Church penal and penitential practice was based on the theory of delayed animation, the condemnation of abortion was never affected by it. Whatever one would want to hold about the time of animation, or when the fetus became a human being in the strict sense of the term, abortion from the time of conception was considered wrong, and the time of animation was never looked on as a moral dividing line between permissible and impermissible abortion.”
Or to put it in the blunter words of the great Lutheran pastor Dietrich Bonhoeffer:“Destruction of the embryo in the mother’s womb is a violation of the right to live which God has bestowed on this nascent life. To raise the question whether we are here concerned already with a human being or not is merely to confuse the issue. The simple fact is that God certainly intended to create a human being and that this nascent human being has been deliberately deprived of his life. And that is nothing but murder.”
Ardent, practicing Catholics will quickly learn from the historical record that from apostolic times, the Christian tradition overwhelmingly held that abortion was grievously evil. In the absence of modern medical knowledge, some of the Early Fathers held that abortion was homicide; others that it was tantamount to homicide; and various scholars theorized about when and how the unborn child might be animated or “ensouled.” But none diminished the unique evil of abortion as an attack on life itself, and the early Church closely associated abortion with infanticide. In short, from the beginning, the believing Christian community held that abortion was always, gravely wrong.
Of course, we now know with biological certainty exactly when human life begins. Thus, today’s religious alibis for abortion and a so-called “right to choose” are nothing more than that – alibis that break radically with historic Christian and Catholic belief.
Abortion kills an unborn, developing human life. It is always gravely evil, and so are the evasions employed to justify it. Catholics who make excuses for it – whether they’re famous or not – fool only themselves and abuse the fidelity of those Catholics who do sincerely seek to follow the Gospel and live their Catholic faith.
The duty of the Church and other religious communities is moral witness. The duty of the state and its officials is to serve the common good, which is always rooted in moral truth. A proper understanding of the “separation of Church and state” does not imply a separation of faith from political life. But of course, it’s always important to know what our faith actually teaches.
+Charles J. Chaput, O.F.M. Cap.
Archbishop of Denver
+James D. Conley
Auxiliary Bishop of Denver




























